Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Intensive Care Med Exp ; 3(1): 59, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26215823

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid (GC) treatment has variable effect in sepsis. This may be explained by decreased expression or function of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The aim of this study was to determine GR expression and binding capacity in patients during and after sepsis. METHODS: In this prospective, non-interventional clinical study, peripheral blood and clinical data were collected from 20 adult patients at five timepoints during sepsis and 5-13 months after recovery. GR expression and binding capacity were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: GR expression was higher in T lymphocytes from patients with septic shock compared to healthy subjects (p = 0.01). While there was no difference in GR expression between GC-treated and non-treated patients, GR binding capacity was lower in GC-treated patients at admission compared to healthy subjects (p ≤ 0.03). After the acute inflammation inflammatory phase, GR binding capacity was still lower in neutrophils of GC-treated patients, compared to healthy subjects (p = 0.01). On admission, GR binding capacity in T lymphocytes and neutrophils was inversely correlated with noradrenaline dose and lactate (p ≤ 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that GR expression is increased in T lymphocytes during septic shock regardless of GC treatment, while GR binding capacity is decreased in neutrophils in GC-treated patients. As neutrophils are the predominant circulating leucocyte in septic shock, their decreased GR binding capacity may impede the response to exogenous or endogenous glucocorticoids.

3.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 48(6): 572-3, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20560789

RESUMO

CASE REPORT: We report a case of self-administration of 75 sachets of moist snuff rectally in a previously healthy, 42-year-old man. He presented with symptoms of nausea, discomfort, and dizziness. He had dry and warm skin, a pulse rate of 53 bpm, a mean arterial blood pressure of 135 mmHg and fluctuations in consciousness. The patient was treated with mechanical ventilation because of respiratory insufficiency. No specific anti-nicotinergic treatment was given. Plasma levels of the nicotine metabolite cotinine were 8,691 µg/L 7 h after admittance and 9,814 µg/L after 12 h. Levels of cotinine in the urine were above >50,000 µg/L. The patient developed a mild pneumonia, but he was uneventfully extubated after 12 h of mechanical ventilation. All physiological parameters were restored and he was discharged from hospital after 36 h. CONCLUSION: Excessive rectal administration of moist snuff may be life threatening. Patients may require intensive care. Long-term sequelae were not seen in this case.


Assuntos
Tabaco sem Fumaça/intoxicação , Administração Retal , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Nicotina/intoxicação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...